|
Dear ones:
Reading
Thomas Sowell can be deleterious to your health.
I mean that
truly, for I have a story to tell you; I was the main character, but Thomas
Sowell was the catalyst. (Surely we can
do as all the nations do, and play the Blame Game with an unsuspecting
successful writer, can’t we? I’m sure
the writer of Race and Economics would approve.)
As happens
once every few months, I am in hot water at my office. Having just polished off Thomas Sowell’s A
Personal Odyssey, and feeling rambunctious, word got around to me that
another employee friend of mine shared my views as to the true nature of
employees in an office – “peons” was the word she used. A mutual office friend [Rebecca] immediately
dashed up to the front desk and told our office manager, “Corri, there’s
something wrong with Chelsea! She says that we’re ‘peons’! You gotta talk to her!” To be fair, Rebecca simply thought the word
itself was amusing, as it began with “pe”, which is one of her favourite
words. However, when I supported Chelsea’s opinion with my
two cents, near pandemonium broke out, for the following reasons:
1.
Five of the peons and one of the overlords (attorneys)
was at the front desk; group situations are always potentially flammable.
2.
When pooh-poohed by an overlord (a good friend of mine
– he can’t help it that he unknowingly perpetuates a culture of poverty), I insisted
that, valued as we were, peons we remained – every good farm depends on them, I
said. I thought that this was merely
insightful and helpful.
3.
Instead of having the (political) good sense to keep
quiet, when challenged I opened up more, and added details, unfavorably
comparing an office to a prison, where you have to pay for your food. This was met by high eyebrows and quick
walking away by a second overlord, anxious to avoid the hordes of peons
storming the castle, no doubt. (He is
also a good friend, with good intentions, who is in the same bind as his peons
– same as the overlords in Braveheart who live exactly like their vassals.)
4.
The office manager became incensed and told me roundly
that SHE was not a peon, no ma’am. I
looked her in the eye and said that, though I would never cast it up to her or
mention it to her face, the fact remained that we were all in the same peonic
boat. This met with less than general
approval.
So today,
there was a dilemma – back down and make everyone feel comfortable? Create a peaceful environment by (a) not
quite saying that I was wrong and yet letting others air their views, (b)
saying it was only my personal view and for goodness’ sake, not to assume that
I meant it applied or had any truthful validity, (c) apologize for hurt
feelings, or (d) ignore it?
I thought
out each and every option, and decided that option B would be too much like
acceding to the popular notion of post-modern subjectivism, C would get us
embroiled in a polite fencing match and be far too close to B, and D was
impossible because of the nature of females.
One cannot simply ignore stiff backs and cold answers for eternity. However, the fact that I am a ‘short-timer’,
as one overlord put it, helped immensely – what were they going to do, fire me
before the Christmas holidays? Not
likely. So I went up to my office
manager and stated the obvious – she was upset.
(Girls take too long; if you’ve offended them, get the obvious over and
go talk about it. Often, all they want
is to vent.) Then the barrage let loose,
and she informed me that it did not just upset HER, there were other people
involved, who felt the same way she did – that though this might be my personal
viewpoint, one should not say such a thing in public, and that We (the office)
wanted to preserve unity. This did not
in ANY WAY devalue me in her eyes as a person. (As if her opinion could counteract the fact of our mutual creation by the holy God.)
Well, there were a few strains in the argument
that are particularly attractive to females.
“I am mad at you, but I have others who agree with me, and somehow, adding
more people’s common opinion is more valid that just upholding my own. Also, peace ought to be preserved rather than
looking at whether your arguments are valid or not; peace above all. Unity is based on how much we agree; we must
preserve a united front. And I still
love you, even though you hold this viewpoint – love the sinner but hate the
sin.” To be fair, she had to speak as
an office manager, and was in ‘official capacity’; so, to help her with the
united front, all I said was that I understood her position, and spoke of
office matters – even stumbled a bit, so that she thought I was contrite yet
stubborn.
Being a
female, I had to get this off my chest in a safe environment, which might not
turn out to be at all safe. But one must
also take risks, and be ready for someone to take your ill-considered words
quite personally. One of the overlords
had the best point of all, that as Christians, we are known as ‘slaves’; and I
believed that I was helping with my illustrations. The questions that remain in my mind are (a)
if this Christian office is this politically correct, I wonder what other
people deal with on a daily basis, and (b) do we really realize how much of our
friendship depends on lock-step thinking?
As I have
said before – so much for the idea that females are so much better at reasoned
debate than males. And if you disagree
with me, I’ll take your head off. 
|